<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>The New Leviathan Blog</provider_name><provider_url>https://socialcapital.is/blog</provider_url><author_name>admin</author_name><author_url>https://socialcapital.is/blog/articles/author/tscf/</author_url><title>Public Good or the Good of the State? - Reforming the Justice System - The New Leviathan Blog</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="l18YSWqTTe"&gt;&lt;a href="https://socialcapital.is/blog/articles/interet-public-ou-interet-detat/"&gt;Public Good or the Good of the State? &#x2013; Reforming the Justice System&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://socialcapital.is/blog/articles/interet-public-ou-interet-detat/embed/#?secret=l18YSWqTTe" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Public Good or the Good of the State? &#x2013; Reforming the Justice System&#x201D; &#x2014; The New Leviathan Blog" data-secret="l18YSWqTTe" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Reforming the justice system The European Court of Human Rights on Monday ruled inadmissible the eight complaints filed against the decision of the Italian courts to authorize the cessation of artificial feeding of a young woman who is quadriplegic and has been in a coma for 16 years. The European Court considered that the plaintiffs [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>http://www.socialcapital.is/blog/wp-content/uploads/image/justice7.jpg</thumbnail_url></oembed>
